<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Drinkable Chicken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4.flowsnake.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4.flowsnake.org</link>
	<description>A Pythoneer's adventures with Scheme, Clojure and a whole lot more. ^_^</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Scherprechter neemt poolshoogte by Juho Vepsäläinen</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/914/comment-page-1#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Juho Vepsäläinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=914#comment-820</guid>
		<description>No language is perfect. I think Python manages to come up with a decent compromise. It&#039;s almost like pseudocode. :)

I think the deal with encapsulation is that some people are really insistent on their getters and setters (perhaps this has something to do with Java?). I find it much cleaner to just use properties and a naming scheme (&quot;_&quot; = protected, visible to subclasses, &quot;__&quot; = private, hidden). I know you can easily bypass a naming scheme but that&#039;s not the point. It&#039;s about communicating the interface.

It&#039;s possible to get rid of some &quot;warts&quot; by writing a little precompiler, by doing some bytecode hacking (search or &quot;selfless python&quot; for instance) or just by metaprogramming. There are also interesting projects like EasyExtend to make certain modifications easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No language is perfect. I think Python manages to come up with a decent compromise. It&#8217;s almost like pseudocode. :)</p>
<p>I think the deal with encapsulation is that some people are really insistent on their getters and setters (perhaps this has something to do with Java?). I find it much cleaner to just use properties and a naming scheme (&#8220;_&#8221; = protected, visible to subclasses, &#8220;__&#8221; = private, hidden). I know you can easily bypass a naming scheme but that&#8217;s not the point. It&#8217;s about communicating the interface.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible to get rid of some &#8220;warts&#8221; by writing a little precompiler, by doing some bytecode hacking (search or &#8220;selfless python&#8221; for instance) or just by metaprogramming. There are also interesting projects like EasyExtend to make certain modifications easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scherprechter neemt poolshoogte by mark</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/914/comment-page-1#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=914#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Couple of minor points: 

The httplib time out thing *has* caught me - but like only as far as &quot;oh this needs a timeout. How do I do it?&quot; I think you just need to set a timeout on socket before you start - no big deal. 

What have you got against &quot;join&quot; - such a useful function for a task I seem to do all the time.

What intrigued me is what you mean by &quot;ultra-dynamic&quot; languages - can you name one or two to give me an example. (or write the blog post implied by &quot;(but that is a different story…)&quot; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of minor points: </p>
<p>The httplib time out thing *has* caught me &#8211; but like only as far as &#8220;oh this needs a timeout. How do I do it?&#8221; I think you just need to set a timeout on socket before you start &#8211; no big deal. </p>
<p>What have you got against &#8220;join&#8221; &#8211; such a useful function for a task I seem to do all the time.</p>
<p>What intrigued me is what you mean by &#8220;ultra-dynamic&#8221; languages &#8211; can you name one or two to give me an example. (or write the blog post implied by &#8220;(but that is a different story…)&#8221; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scherprechter neemt poolshoogte by Charles McCreary</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/914/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles McCreary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=914#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Hans, 
The guy obviously doesn&#039;t understand much about dynamic languages and the benefits thereof. Python is not the perfect solution for every problem, but unless I&#039;m coding high performance FEA routines and their ilk or Linux device drivers/modules, Python is the first tool I reach for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hans,<br />
The guy obviously doesn&#8217;t understand much about dynamic languages and the benefits thereof. Python is not the perfect solution for every problem, but unless I&#8217;m coding high performance FEA routines and their ilk or Linux device drivers/modules, Python is the first tool I reach for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with Gentoo by Hans Nowak</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/900/comment-page-1#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Nowak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=900#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Yes, as a temporary solution, I am now using the Terminus font, which has sizes larger than 16. I will probably end up making my own font... party like it&#039;s 1989... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, as a temporary solution, I am now using the Terminus font, which has sizes larger than 16. I will probably end up making my own font&#8230; party like it&#8217;s 1989&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fun with Gentoo by Joel</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/900/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=900#comment-729</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re wanting to change the console font size on one of the tty terminals then all you need to do is edit /etc/conf.d/consolefont and set CONSOLEFONT to what you want it set as. Console fonts on linux also don&#039;t go by pixels, they go by number of characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re wanting to change the console font size on one of the tty terminals then all you need to do is edit /etc/conf.d/consolefont and set CONSOLEFONT to what you want it set as. Console fonts on linux also don&#8217;t go by pixels, they go by number of characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear lazyweb: Which Linux distro should I use? by Krys</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/887/comment-page-1#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Krys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=887#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I have been using openSUSE for a few years now as my desktop and for my servers at home and work.  My servers work only in text mode.  I have found openSUSE to be very capable in text mode with all the usual command-line awesomeness you would expect in a *nix.

Additionally, openSUSE&#039;s YaST administration tool works equally well under both GUI and text mode.  Meaning you get nice menus and tabs and dropdowns, etc. to administer your system, rather than remembering a ton of esoteric command line switches and text file formats.  Though you can use those too, if you like. :)

I don&#039;t know of another distro that provides that kind of text mode administration system, and I have to say that having it does make openSUSE a breeze to administer in text mode (most of the time!) :)

Anyway, hope this helps. :)  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I have been using openSUSE for a few years now as my desktop and for my servers at home and work.  My servers work only in text mode.  I have found openSUSE to be very capable in text mode with all the usual command-line awesomeness you would expect in a *nix.</p>
<p>Additionally, openSUSE&#8217;s YaST administration tool works equally well under both GUI and text mode.  Meaning you get nice menus and tabs and dropdowns, etc. to administer your system, rather than remembering a ton of esoteric command line switches and text file formats.  Though you can use those too, if you like. :)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of another distro that provides that kind of text mode administration system, and I have to say that having it does make openSUSE a breeze to administer in text mode (most of the time!) :)</p>
<p>Anyway, hope this helps. :)  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear lazyweb: Which Linux distro should I use? by Markino</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/887/comment-page-1#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Markino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=887#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Fedora ha a PPC support too :) 
i have used it succesfully on old an old Ibook Tangerine Clamshell :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fedora ha a PPC support too :)<br />
i have used it succesfully on old an old Ibook Tangerine Clamshell :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear lazyweb: Which Linux distro should I use? by Hans</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/887/comment-page-1#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=887#comment-715</guid>
		<description>If this is primarily a python development machine, I second the recommendation for Ubuntu server.  If you are planning to do PHP development (shudder), Gentoo&#039;s portage system makes the custom-compiled PHP much easier (i.e. You can have your custom --with-* flags while still using the package manager).  In general, if you&#039;re a tweaker, Gentoo is nice; on the otherhand, compiling can be slow and i&#039;ve found that when gentoo breaks, it breaks hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is primarily a python development machine, I second the recommendation for Ubuntu server.  If you are planning to do PHP development (shudder), Gentoo&#8217;s portage system makes the custom-compiled PHP much easier (i.e. You can have your custom &#8211;with-* flags while still using the package manager).  In general, if you&#8217;re a tweaker, Gentoo is nice; on the otherhand, compiling can be slow and i&#8217;ve found that when gentoo breaks, it breaks hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear lazyweb: Which Linux distro should I use? by Grig Gheorghiu</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/887/comment-page-1#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Grig Gheorghiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=887#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu all the way. Easy to install, developer friendly (up-to-date packages including Python 2.6), easy to update (apt-get install)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu all the way. Easy to install, developer friendly (up-to-date packages including Python 2.6), easy to update (apt-get install)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear lazyweb: Which Linux distro should I use? by jdd</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/887/comment-page-1#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>jdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=887#comment-711</guid>
		<description>I recommend arch, assuming it runs well on PPC. See http://www.archlinuxppc.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend arch, assuming it runs well on PPC. See <a href="http://www.archlinuxppc.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.archlinuxppc.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
