Comments on: Sunday nitpickery: class-based vs prototype-based OO http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92 A Pythoneer's adventures with Scheme, etc. Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:37:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: dan http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/comment-page-1#comment-341 dan Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:27:04 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-341 It seems to me that the addition of 'classes' to javascript is a sensless hack aimed at making the language more accessable to class-based oo minded people who can't get their head around the prototype paradigm. JS doesn't need it and it's inclusion in JS2 bothers me. It seems to me that the addition of ‘classes’ to javascript is a sensless hack aimed at making the language more accessable to class-based oo minded people who can’t get their head around the prototype paradigm.

JS doesn’t need it and it’s inclusion in JS2 bothers me.

]]> By: creidiki http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/comment-page-1#comment-221 creidiki Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:04:52 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-221 Hey, there's at least 3 of us! :D Hey, there’s at least 3 of us! :D

]]> By: Hans Nowak http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/comment-page-1#comment-211 Hans Nowak Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:34:19 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-211 Ah! Both of my readers speak up! :-) I shall prepare a post in which I explain my position. Ah! Both of my readers speak up! :-) I shall prepare a post in which I explain my position.

]]> By: John Cowan http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/comment-page-1#comment-209 John Cowan Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:15:17 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-209 Flexibility is in the mind of the programmer. C pointers are more flexible than arrays, but a language with both arrays and pointers feels more flexible, easier to adapt to one's currently preferred way of thinking, even when (as in C) arrays are little more than syntactic sugar over pointers. Flexibility is in the mind of the programmer. C pointers are more flexible than arrays, but a language with both arrays and pointers feels more flexible, easier to adapt to one’s currently preferred way of thinking, even when (as in C) arrays are little more than syntactic sugar over pointers.

]]> By: Michael Foord http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/comment-page-1#comment-208 Michael Foord Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:46:41 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-208 "Prototype-based OO is, by its very nature, more flexible than class-based." Hmmm... I'd be interested to hear the justification for that statement. “Prototype-based OO is, by its very nature, more flexible than class-based.”

Hmmm… I’d be interested to hear the justification for that statement.

]]>