<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday nitpickery: class-based vs prototype-based OO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92</link>
	<description>A Pythoneer's adventures with Chicken Scheme. ^_^ And more.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 08:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-341</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the addition of 'classes' to javascript is a sensless hack aimed at making the language more accessable to class-based oo minded people who can't get their head around the prototype paradigm.

JS doesn't need it and it's inclusion in JS2 bothers me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the addition of 'classes' to javascript is a sensless hack aimed at making the language more accessable to class-based oo minded people who can't get their head around the prototype paradigm.</p>
<p>JS doesn't need it and it's inclusion in JS2 bothers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creidiki</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>creidiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Hey, there's at least 3 of us! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, there's at least 3 of us! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Nowak</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Nowak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Ah! Both of my readers speak up! :-)  I shall prepare a post in which I explain my position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah! Both of my readers speak up! :-)  I shall prepare a post in which I explain my position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Flexibility is in the mind of the programmer.   C pointers are more flexible than arrays, but a language with both arrays and pointers feels more flexible, easier to adapt to one's currently preferred way of thinking, even when (as in C) arrays are little more than syntactic sugar over pointers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexibility is in the mind of the programmer.   C pointers are more flexible than arrays, but a language with both arrays and pointers feels more flexible, easier to adapt to one's currently preferred way of thinking, even when (as in C) arrays are little more than syntactic sugar over pointers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Foord</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Foord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/92#comment-208</guid>
		<description>"Prototype-based OO is, by its very nature, more flexible than class-based."

Hmmm... I'd be interested to hear the justification for that statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Prototype-based OO is, by its very nature, more flexible than class-based."</p>
<p>Hmmm... I'd be interested to hear the justification for that statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
