<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python vs Scheme: function parameters (part III)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/67/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/67</link>
	<description>A Pythoneer's adventures with Chicken Scheme. ^_^ And more.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: creidiki</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/67#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>creidiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/67#comment-109</guid>
		<description>With the way macros generate functions and the way you can make functions that take functions as arguments and return functions to other functions, it would make little sense if that kind of thing wasn't evaluated at run-time instead of at compile/define time.

But yeah, its definitely cool :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the way macros generate functions and the way you can make functions that take functions as arguments and return functions to other functions, it would make little sense if that kind of thing wasn't evaluated at run-time instead of at compile/define time.</p>
<p>But yeah, its definitely cool :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
