<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SRE regular expression syntax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60</link>
	<description>A Pythoneer's adventures with Chicken Scheme. ^_^ And more.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Fawcett</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Fawcett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-103</guid>
		<description>You might also be interested in Regular-Tree expressions. RT expressions are like regexes for matching sexprs, rather than matching strings.

http://library.readscheme.org/servlets/cite.ss?pattern=sw2004-bagrak

If I'm not mistaken, Olin Shivers, one of the principal authors, also designed the SRE syntax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might also be interested in Regular-Tree expressions. RT expressions are like regexes for matching sexprs, rather than matching strings.</p>
<p><a href="http://library.readscheme.org/servlets/cite.ss?pattern=sw2004-bagrak" rel="nofollow">http://library.readscheme.org/servlets/cite.ss?pattern=sw2004-bagrak</a></p>
<p>If I'm not mistaken, Olin Shivers, one of the principal authors, also designed the SRE syntax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I like S-expression regular expressions very much.  It wouldn't be at all hard to port them to Chicken or even rewrite them from scratch, as all they do is process the S-expression and return a string containing the equivalent PCRE, being sure to do all the escaping that's needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like S-expression regular expressions very much.  It wouldn't be at all hard to port them to Chicken or even rewrite them from scratch, as all they do is process the S-expression and return a string containing the equivalent PCRE, being sure to do all the escaping that's needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creidiki</title>
		<link>http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>creidiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/60#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I've been wondering that myself. We use guile for our scheme init scripts, and the (ice-9 regex) module also implements the API but not the syntax.

Its not like it would be slower running regexps defined that way, you have to compile them anyway if you intend to use them with any decent speed... perhaps just lack of developer time :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been wondering that myself. We use guile for our scheme init scripts, and the (ice-9 regex) module also implements the API but not the syntax.</p>
<p>Its not like it would be slower running regexps defined that way, you have to compile them anyway if you intend to use them with any decent speed... perhaps just lack of developer time :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
