Comments on: Cutting http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/125 A Pythoneer's adventures with Scheme, Clojure and a whole lot more. ^_^ Sat, 22 May 2010 22:09:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: PJW http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/125/comment-page-1#comment-337 PJW Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:00:01 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=125#comment-337 I do not see a reason why cut can not be implemented in a fashion that allows for: > (map (cut + 1 (* 2 )) '(1 2 3)) It is just writing syntax-rules macros that need nested recursion is a pain, at least in my opinion. At least if it is not possible it is not obvious to me the reason why it would be so. I do not see a reason why cut can not be implemented in a fashion that allows for:
> (map (cut + 1 (* 2 )) ‘(1 2 3))

It is just writing syntax-rules macros that need nested recursion is a pain, at least in my opinion. At least if it is not possible it is not obvious to me the reason why it would be so.

]]> By: website design http://4.flowsnake.org/archives/125/comment-page-1#comment-336 website design Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:39:49 +0000 http://4.flowsnake.org/?p=125#comment-336 > As a result, it's simultaneously more and less limited than cut I love this type of sentences. They simultaneously help and prevent understanding. > As a result, it’s simultaneously more and less limited than cut I love this type of sentences. They simultaneously help and prevent understanding.

]]>